Daisy Alvarez
Comm 309
Sexting Blog
The Future of Sexting
Sexting is a recent phenomenon that resulted from equipping people with the technology to take, send, and upload pictures instantly from personal mobile devices. The future of it is important to examine in order to understand the nature with which this trend will be dealt with, and the future developments of this type of social interaction. The future of sexting involves new laws to deal with children entwined in the legal issues of this current moral panic, the expansion of new technologies to monitor children’s cellular activities, and technological advancements to satisfy consumers demand for sexual interaction through technology. http://open.salon.com/blog/sexting_is_stupid/2009/06/02/sexting_safety_and_the_social_norm_are_you_normal
Currently, the legal problems dealing with sexting involve the distribution and possession of child pornography. Children and teens are utilizing their mobile devices to share nude or semi-nude pictures to peers and significant others. An article in Newsweek reports about a case which exemplifies this dilemma of dealing with sexting. The case is from Greensburg, Pa. where three girls were charged for disseminating child pornography. The boys that had received the images of their girlfriends were also charged but for possession of child pornography.
Children do not know or understand that their seemingly innocent acts can turn them into felons. The child pornography laws are intended to protect children and teens today but yet they are being used to prosecute them. These laws make the children have to register as sex offenders at times for one decade if not two. A sex offender would be someone who has been convicted of a crime involving sex including rape, molestation, sexual harassment, and pornography production or distribution.
In the future, officials will create new laws that reflect the severity of the crime. Minors will not be protected from the dangers of technology by a life-long criminal record. According to an article in the Washington Times, Vermont is conducting hearings in an attempt to decriminalize texting for teenagers between the ages of 13 and 18. This is an example of the type of laws that will emerge in the near future.
The problem of how to punish teens that share explicit photos could be prevented if such photos were not transmitted. Preventing children from sending racy photos is in the near future with the development of new technologies. New surveillance gadgets are equipping parents with the tools needed to prevent sexting. For example, there is a new RADAR technology which gives parents the opportunity to scroll their children’s phonebooks and mark the contacts as suspicious. Once a contact is marked as suspicious, any messages sent and received from that contact will be forwarded to the parent. http://www.globalethics.org/newsline/2009/04/20/sexting-2/
Another technological program for parents is TextGaurd. TextGuard gives the parents the power to block texts and to remotely control the mobile device. The parental monitoring equipment allows parents to block previously specified problematic lingo, block calls, block certain URL’s, and lock the phone during hours during which children should be studying. http://www.prlog.org/10218048-new-way-to-stop-your-child-from-sexting-on-their-mobile-phones.html
This type of technology is going to be used by the masses in the near future to contain the problems of sexting. If children know parents are aware of all the messages they are transmitting, then they would be less risqué.
Sexting caught society by surprise. People didn’t expect that the technology of mobile phones would be used to send sexual pictures. Technological companies are always updating their devices and equipping them with better capabilities. So, what new types of threats will result in response to such technological advancements? Sexcasting. Sexcasting could be an even bigger issue than sexting. Sextcasting is “the process by which an individual(s) performs actions of a risqué or sexually explicit nature via a (live) webcam (or webcast), digital (image or video) camera, or other form of digital technology and sends and/or saves the content of their actions using digital technologies (i.e. a computer, camera card, email, social website, message board, etc).” http://community.mtv.com/Post/Sexting-and-SextCasting-Could-Make-You-an-Ignorant-Pornographer/0D3FCFFFF01B2BED0000800BA8669?ref_title=SEXTING+IS+STUPID&ref_url=http%3a%2f%2fcommunity.mtv.com%2fprofile%2fSEXTINGISSTUPID%2fMyFeed.aspx&ref_ucid=D0BEB20101B2BED0000101B2BED0
The video recording capabilities of phones and webcams are the only tools needed to create sexcasts. Whether the videos are intended for private sharing or public sharing, the possible harm is greater than that of sexting.
Sexting has demonstrated that technology is making its way into even more personal aspects of our life. Technology is intended to make our lives easier, make us an advanced society, and to create a global community. Thanks to technological advancements, we have a greater understanding of events all over the world. Without a doubt, it was only a matter of time until technology was utilized with sexual intent.
Cell phones and computers are being used to carry out sexual acts without the need of actual human contact. Teenagers are getting to know each other sexually without having to have any human contact. So what is next, if people can perform sexual acts without having to be in the same room? People’s use of technology for sexual satisfaction is being manifested in Sexbots.
Perhaps sexbots are where sexting and sexcasting are leading us to. They provide what sexting and sexcasting already do, sexual interaction without messy human interaction. http://www.shapingyouth.org/?p=10049
Traditional private and public boundaries have been altered with the proliferation of cell phones and other technology. The framework of society has been redefined which has lead to changes in interpersonal relationships. But just as there are drawbacks and risks with new technologies, the same technology can also be utilized to monitor possible harmful side effects.
References
Fortunati, L. (2002). The Mobile Phone: Towards New Categories and Social Relations. Information, Communication and Society, 5(4), 515-16. Retrieved March 10, 2010, from the Academic Search Premier database.
Hicks, M. (2009, April 15). ‘Sexting’ uncool, but also wrong. The Washington Times, p. A16. Retrieved March 9, 2010, from the Academic Search Premier database.
Lithwick, D. (2009, February 23). Teens, Nude Photos and the Law. Newsweek, 153. Retrieved March 10, 2010, from the Academic Search Premier database.